Posts Tagged ‘link farms’

Have You Created A Web Spam Website?

Web spam is a big problem for the search engines and is something they view extremely seriously. The search engines aim to provide their users with relevant and useful search results. If business owners use unethical SEO techniques and create sites of web spam, these websites may be ranked highly by the search engines. The search engines aim to provide their users with a productive and useful search service and suggesting low quality search results is not acceptable.

Bing has recently revealed some information about how it views and deals with spam sites. This information is not new or surprising but does reaffirm once again the importance of ethical SEO.

It is common on page SEO techniques which Bing looks out for when assessing the quality of websites and trying to determine if a website is spam or not. If the content within the site has obviously been created for the manipulation of the search engines, it will be noticed. Keyword stuffing is one of the most common problems. Hidden text within a website and doorway pages created to increase traffic from the search engines are also regular indicators of a spam website.

Bing also investigates the links to a website. The links you have to your site can play a significant role in how your website is ranked in the search results. Many business owners are aware of this and attempt to improve their rankings by establishing as many links to their website as possible. Link farms and link exchanges are often how this is done. However, this is not beneficial because it is not viewed as ethical link building.

Links to your site must be relevant, useful and be built over a period of time in a genuine manner. Low quality links can reflect badly on your business and will be easily identifiable by the search engines. A website with numerous low quality links will be viewed by Bing as a spam website and will be treated appropriately.

The search engines will not accept spam websites and punish them as much as they can. Sites operating outside of the guidelines provided by the search engines will experience lower rankings and may even be banned from the search results completely.

Bing does not advise sites to use any black hat SEO methods at all because these techniques are noticeable and companies found using them will be punished. Other search engines also take a similar view to this and will punish those attempting to manipulate them in any way. If you want your business site to be ranked highly in any of the search results provided by the search engines, you must adhere to their guidelines and ensure you do not develop a web spam site.

At SEO Consult, we know the importance of ethical search engine optimisation and only use the most proven and accepted white hat SEO methods. We can help you to develop a high quality and successful SEO campaign and business.

What Is A Link Building Farm?

You may have heard the term ‘link building farm’ or ‘link farm’ used in relation to the ‘bad neighbourhood’ concept in SEO circles. While it is fairly guessable what a link building farm might be, it is helpful to have a good understanding of the term.

‘Link farm’ is a term that often is defined as a collection of sites that all have hyperlinks to every other site in the group, and while some link farms are like this, not all are. Most link building farms build links for websites by creating a page that is almost entirely links. This means it has little or no actual content, one of the reasons search engines don’t value link farms.

The term ‘link farm’ is intimately associated with black hat techniques of search engine optimisation. There is a grey area, however, as there are legitimate reciprocal link schemes around that do not create the kind of spam that search engines hate. As with many grey areas in search engine optimisation, most companies choose to avoid it altogether.

Google is typically mysterious about their precise definition of what a link farm is. Google Webmaster JohnMu last year said that the search engine giant’s stand on this issue is to bring it back to what your viewers want. In a thread on the subject, he trotted out Google’s usual line when it comes to grey areas: ‘A good rule of thumb is to ask yourself “would I be doing this (linking there) if search engines didn’t exist?” Another way of looking at it is to think about where and how you will be linking … Do you want your visitors to see and use it or is it just for the search engines?’ (Google Groups, May 2008) The question of ‘would I be doing this if search engines didn’t exist’ is not hugely helpful as, in reality it covers about 80% of what webmasters do. The basic concept is clear, however. If you aim to increase the value of your viewer’s experience, you are on the right track, and if you are doing something that feels wrong, it probably is.

Being associated with a link farm can cause long-term harm to your site. Just as a good SEO campaign can take time to take effect, links to seemingly well-intentioned directories can turn bad over time. Webado, a webmaster commenting on the Google thread above, told of how, in her initial days of webmastering a charity site, she submitted it into a web directory. At the time, the web directory owners gave the impression that the directory was highly selective. Several years later, however, Webado discovered her site was still on the directory and now hidden among links to porn. The issue only got resolved when the directory was taken offline.

Not all sites are so lucky. Spammers are desperate to give their spam site credibility, and using a reputable site as a link is one way to do this. They do not easily let go, and usually will not respond to communication.

Link farms can be avoided by researching the sites you want your link featured on. Check a site’s PageRank and investigate its associates before submitting your link. The best way to ensure that your link is featured only in good neighbourhoods is to get the advice of professionals. Talk to your consultant at SEO Consult about linking as part of your SEO campaign.